ESMO Practice Guideline · February 2026

ESMO Adaptation of Lines of
Systemic Therapy

A consensus framework for standardising the designation of lines of therapy in solid tumours — developed by 49 international experts through structured Delphi consensus.

Line of Therapy
1.0
First-line therapy started
eLoTaLoTiLoT

Patient Care

Ensures optimal treatment sequencing

Clinical Trials

Uniform eligibility criteria

Real-World Data

Standardised RWD collection

Research

Enables cross-institutional data pooling

The EnLiST Framework

A standardised approach to enumerating lines of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) across all clinical settings.

Why EnLiST?

No universal definition of "line of therapy" previously existed, causing data fragmentation across institutions.

Delphi Consensus

49 international experts reached consensus through a structured multi-round Delphi process.

Universal Scope

Applicable to all solid tumours across early, advanced, and investigational settings.

The Decimal Notation System

Each line of therapy is expressed as two numerals separated by a decimal point.

1Sequential line
.
0Modification
Initial treatment — no prior systemic therapy in this clinical setting.
NEW

New LoT

Clinical progression of disease (cPD) or inadequate tumour response

1.02.0
MOD

Modified LoT

Treatment change for reasons other than progression (e.g., intolerability)

1.01.1
SAME

Same LoT

No treatment change designation — therapy continues unchanged

1.01.0

Three Distinct Settings

EnLiST assigns LoT separately within each clinical context.

eLoTEarly Setting

Lines of therapy in the curative-intent setting, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments.

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Adjuvant systemic therapy
  • Perioperative regimens
aLoTAdvanced Setting

Lines of therapy for advanced, recurrent, or metastatic disease where cure is not the primary goal.

  • First-line palliative chemotherapy
  • Second-line targeted therapy
  • Maintenance regimens
iLoTInvestigational Setting

Lines of therapy within clinical trials and investigational contexts.

  • Phase I/II/III trial therapies
  • Compassionate use
  • Expanded access programmes

Clinical Scenarios

See how EnLiST applies to real-world treatment sequences.

Metastatic Breast Cancer

HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer with sequential systemic therapies and a treatment modification.

aLoT
aLoT 1.0
CDK4/6 inhibitor + Aromatase Inhibitor
First-line for metastatic disease
Modified
aLoT 1.1
CDK4/6 inhibitor + Fulvestrant
Switch due to AI intolerability
New
aLoT 2.0
Everolimus + Exemestane
Clinical progression (cPD)
New
aLoT 3.0
Capecitabine
Further progression (cPD)

Key Takeaways

1

Each line of therapy is expressed as two numerals separated by a decimal point (e.g., 1.0), assigned separately in early (eLoT), advanced (aLoT), and investigational (iLoT) settings.

2

Disease progression triggers a New LoT — the left numeral increments. Treatment changes for other reasons trigger a Modified LoT — the right numeral increments.

3

The framework was developed through structured Delphi consensus with 49 international experts across multiple stakeholder groups.

4

EnLiST applies to all solid tumours and covers maintenance therapy, drug holidays, rechallenges, and combination regimen modifications.

5

Standardised LoT designation is critical for equitable clinical trial eligibility, real-world data harmonisation, and regulatory consistency.

6

By separating investigational therapy (iLoT) from standard care lines, EnLiST preserves accurate treatment history for clinical decision-making.

Knowledge Check

How well do you understand the EnLiST framework?

7 Questions

Lines of therapy notation, clinical settings, and framework principles

Start Quiz

Publication & Resources

Citation

Saini KS, Trapani D, et al. ESMO Adaptation of Lines of Systemic Therapy (EnLiST): a consensus framework for standardising the designation of lines of therapy in solid tumours. Annals of Oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2026.02.008

49International Experts
44Co-Authors
3Clinical Settings
2026Published

Why Standardisation Matters

Without a universal definition, "line of therapy" varies between institutions, trials, and countries — leading to fragmented data, inequitable trial access, and unreliable real-world evidence.

Multi-Stakeholder Approach

The Delphi process engaged medical oncologists, clinical trialists, regulators, patient advocates, pharma representatives, CROs, AI professionals, funding bodies, and ethicists.